OF NOLLE PROSEQUI AND WITHDRAWALS – AT WHAT STAGE OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTION CAN THEY BE ENTERED AND OF WHAT EFFECT DO THEY HAVE IN CRIMINAL JURISPRUDENCE IN GHANA?
The Ghanaian media has been inundated with discussions on
the state's decision to discontinue criminal prosecutions against several
high-profile individuals of the National Democratic Congress (NDC) which were
initiated by the erstwhile NPP government, including Samuel Ofosu Ampofo,
Anthony Kwaku Boahen, Dr. Stephen Kwabena Opuni, and Seidu Agongo. The Attorney
General's (AG) instruction to withdraw charges has raised questions about the
distinction between a Nolle Prosequi and a withdrawal of charges.
It's unclear from the information provided whether the AG
entered a Nolle Prosequi or simply withdrew the charges. The distinction is
crucial, as a Nolle Prosequi would imply that the state is unwilling to
continue the prosecution, while a withdrawal of charges might suggest that the
prosecution is being discontinued due to other reasons.
This article examines the stages at which a Nolle
prosequi and Withdrawal can be entered and their effects on criminal trials.
In Ghana, the Attorney-General has the discretion to
discontinue a prosecution through a Nolle Prosequi (NP) or Withdrawal. The
Attorney General's discretionary power to enter a Nolle Prosequi is not
accompanied by an obligation to provide reasons. However, this power must be
exercised in conformity with Article 296 of the 1992 Constitution of Ghana.
Article 296 mandates that discretionary power be
exercised fairly, impartially, and in accordance with due process. This ensures
that decisions are not arbitrary, capricious, or biased.
In many common law jurisdictions, the Attorney-General or
the prosecution has the discretion to discontinue a prosecution by entering a
Nolle Prosequi. This discretion is usually exercised in cases where:
1. The
prosecution's case is weak or lacks evidence.
2. The
accused has already been punished sufficiently.
3. The
prosecution's witnesses are unavailable or unreliable.
4. The
public interest does not require a prosecution.
In Ghana, Article 88 of the 1992 Constitution indeed
vests the Attorney-General with significant powers regarding prosecutions.
Article 88 (3) provides that the Attorney-General shall be responsible for the
initiation and conduct of all prosecutions of criminal offences. Criminal
Prosecutions in Ghana are in two folds – summary trial and trial by indictment.
At what stage of the prosecution can Nolle Prosequi be
entered?
Section 54 of Ghana’s CRIMINAL AND OTHER OFFENCES
(PROCEDURE) ACT 1960 (ACT30) provides that Nolle Prosequi can be entered at any
stage of the prosecution, from the commencement of the trial to the end of the
trial, BEFORE JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED.
What effect shall it have?
When a Nolle Prosequi is entered, it has the following
effects:
1. Discontinuance
of prosecution and the accused is DISCHARGED.
2. No
acquittal: A Nolle Prosequi does not amount to an acquittal, and the accused
may still be re-arraigned on the same charges in the future if new evidence
emerges.
3. No bar to
future prosecution: The entry of a Nolle Prosequi does not bar future
prosecution for the same offense
An Accused Person cannot plead "autre fois
acquit" or "autre fois convict" in future trials on the same
charges if a NP was entered. "Autre fois acquit" (also known as
"double jeopardy") and "autre fois convict" are common law
pleas that prevent an accused from being tried again for the same offense after
being acquitted or convicted.
CAN A PLAINTIFF RELY ON NOLLE PROSEQUI ENTERED IN HIS
FAVOUR TO MOUNT A CLAIM OF MALICIOUS PROSECUTION? – A TOPIC FOR ANOTHER DAY
WITHDRAWALS
Section 59 (1) of Act 30 provides that in any trial or
preliminary proceedings before a District Court any prosecutor on the
instructions of the Attorney General at any time before judgment is pronounced
may withdraw from the prosecution of any person either generally or in respect
of any offences with which he is charged.
Although Section 59(1) of Act 30 refers to proceedings
before a District Court, the effect of Withdrawals applies to all summary
proceedings from the High Court to other lower Courts as provided by Section
59(4). Section 59 (4) provides that the provisions of the preceding subsections
shall apply mutatis mutandis to summary trials before the High Court or a
Circuit Court
The effect of Withdrawal depends on the stage of
prosecution:
a) if it is
made during any enquiry under Part IV (Trial by Indictment) the accused shall
be discharged in respect of the offence(s)
b) if it is
made during a trial—
(i) before
the prosecution closes its case - the accused shall be DISCHARGED in in respect
of the offence(s)
(ii) after the
prosecution has been closed its case - the accused shall be ACQUITTED in the
offence(s) and can plead "autre fois acquit" or "autre fois
convict" in future trials on the same charges.
In Conclusion, Nolle Prosequi and Withdrawals may have
similar effects on criminal trials depending on the stage of the trial where
they are entered. However, if a Withdrawal is made after the prosecution has
closed its case, the accused shall be acquitted and can plead "autre fois
acquit" or "autre fois convict" in future trials on the same
charges flowing from the same facts.
It is my respectful submission that the Attorney General
has withdrawn all charges against the accused persons. Given that the
prosecution had closed its case in these matters, the withdrawal of charges
operates as an acquittal.
As a result, the accused persons cannot be tried again on
the same charges arising from the same facts in the future. While the
withdrawal of charges does not necessarily imply innocence, it brings a
definitive end to the current prosecution.
The writer, Michael Kwablah (Facebook ID – MKGhaddafi) is
a Lawyer and Human Resource Practitioner.
Tel – 0249199541
Email – m.kwablah06@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment