On 30th of July, 2024, the Court of Appeal of
Ghana by a majority decision of 2 -1, acquitted and discharged the Hon. Cassiel
Ato Forson and Richard Jakpa in the trial popularly known as the Ambulance
trial case. You can scroll down to download the full judgment, but I have also summarized
it below for easy reading.
WHO ARE THE JUDGES
Majority Judges
1. Kweku T. Ackaah-Boafo J.A
2. P. Bright Mensah J.A
Minority (dissenting Judge)
1. Alex Poku-Acheamong J.A.
For you to understand, note that the two majority
judges are the ones who agreed that Ato Forson and Richard Jakpa should be set
free. The dissenting Judge disagreed that’s why he is characterized as minority
or dissenting. This is normal in both the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court and
that is why they always have an odd number. You can read their independent
detailed reasons in the full case when you click on the link at the end of this
page.
SUMMARY OF CASE
The two accused persons are amongst three who were arraigned
before the High Court Accra and charged with the offences of willfully causing
financial loss to the state amongst others.
For his part, Cassiel Ato Forson signed a letter on
behalf of the then Minister of Finance, Seth Tekper to request for the
establishment of Letters of Credit (LC) for the payment of the Ambulances which
was being purchased by the government through the Ministry of Health.
For his part, Richard Jakpa is the local representative
of Big Sea General Trading Limited, a Dubai based company which was contracted
by the Ministry of Health for the supply of the said vehicles.
Upon arrival of the first 30 of the vehicles, it was
detected that they were so manifestly defective that they could not be used for
the purpose of providing ambulance services.
After the close of case of the prosecution, the
accused persons filed a submission of no case asking the High Court to set them
free because they believed the Attorney General had not been able to lead any
credible evidence to establish a case against them. NB:(Under the
law, if the prosecution fails to prove the crime, the accused person is not
obliged to defend himself. He is set free. The accused only defends himself
when the prosecution has been able to prove its case in the court.)
The trial High Court dismissed the submission of no
case and asked the accused to open their defence. They therefore appealed that
decision whilst defending themselves in the high Court. This decision was made on
30th March, 2023.
On 30th July, 2024, that is, one year and 4
months after appealing, the Court of Appeal approved the appeal by acquitting
them and discharging them.
This decision effectively brought to an end the ongoing
trial at the High Court.
Just imagine, it took the court of appeal all this time
to come out with its decision. Assuming the High Court had finished the trial
before the Court of Appeal decision and the high court had found them guilty, they would have
spent some time in jail before this decision of the court of appeal.
What do you think about the rule in Ghana that an
appeal is not an automatic “stay’ or pausing of the main case? Do you think the
law should be amended to ensure that every appeal halts the main case until the
appeal has been decided. What will be the pros and cons to such an amendment? Let’s
discuss your views in the comments section below.
You can read/ download the Full Judgment of the Court
of appeal by clinking this link. FULL JUDGMENT.
Kindly subscribe to this blog for updates whenever I
post a new article. You can also follow or subscribe to my contents on the
following social media channels so we have more interactions. FACEBOOK, TIKTOK,
YOU TUBE.
Yours Truly,
Richard Nii Amarh
Interesting
ReplyDelete