Ghana recently passed a plea bargain law. This was actually an amendment to the criminal and other offences procedure act in order to allow for plea bargain to happen during trials. This Article seeks to shed some light on the relevant portions of this law and what it means to the ordinary citizen.
First of all, what is a Plea Bargain? This
can be explained as a procedure that allows the state (prosecutor) to negotiate
with an accused person who is willing to admit guilt so that a lesser
punishment would be given to him instead of the full punishment. It can
sometimes lead to the accused walking away free. In other words, this law is
about “how to commit a crime and walk home free”. The term “walking
home free” here must be used advisedly. The most critical thing here is
negotiation. One advantage is that it helps us reduce the number of persons who
are sent to prison for offences that could have been resolved. It also affords an opportunity for the
offender to compensate the victim where applicable.
Just imagine a domestic violence which
happened in a compound house or a community. The victim reports the offender
and the offender goes to jail for let’s say 6 months and comes back home. What
will be the relationship in the community or the compound house? Your guess is
as good as mine. If for example, the offender apologized and compensated the
victim, what do you think would happen to their relationship?
WHO CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE OF PLEA
BARGAIN?
Any person who has been charged with an
offence and is standing trail in a court can take advantage of plea bargain.
Under the law, when a person decides to
come under the plea bargain, he or she must do so with the consent of the
prosecutor as well as the victim involved. This means that the prosecutor must
agree and the complainant or the person who suffered as a result of the crime
must also agree to the bargain.
When
this agreement is reached, the offense could be reduced to a lesser offence.
The prosecution can also decide to withdraw the entire charge altogether and
the judge can also decide to give a lesser punishment for the offense which has
been charged. A plea agreement may do any of the following;
1.
Recommend
a sentence or a range of sentences
to the Court;
2.
Require the payment by the accused
person of compensation to a victim of the offence: or
3.
Require the accused to make
restitution but with the prior consent of the victim.
Both
the accused and the prosecutor can initiate the process for the plea bargain. But
if it is initiated by the prosecutor, then he / she is required to inform the
accused of his right to demand a full trial. The reason is that, a plea bargain
presupposes that the accused is pleading guilty but only avoiding a harsh
sentence which is usually custodial (prison term). A person who believes he/she
is innocent does not need to enter into a plea bargain. The entry of plea
bargain has the effect of convicting the accused and helping him avoid a prison
term or a lower term if any. When you are convicted, you will be subject to all
the things that a convict is subject to. For example, if the offence involves
dishonesty, you cannot hold certain public offices in the country for some time
even though you have not gone to jail. A conviction is always a conviction.
The
prosecution is also required to serve all disclosures it shall rely on for the
case on the accused person before they can conclude on plea bargain with the
accused.
When
an agreement is reached, the prosecutor (state) has to file it in court. The
court will also do its due diligence by asking both the accused and the victim
relevant questions to satisfy itself that the bargain was voluntary and agreed
by all. If the court is satisfied, it can adopt the agreement and sentence /
punish the accused according to what has been recommended. The court can also
decide to change the recommendation and apply the kind of punishment it deems
fit. The court may even ask for the negotiation to be done again.
The
court also has the power to reject the plea bargain agreement and give reasons
why it has rejected it. If a court rejects the agreement, it will order for
full trail of the case to begin. When a court rejects the plea agreement, this
decision cannot be appealed. But it does not prevent the prosecution and the
accused to start a new plea bargain before the same court.
If the court should also accept the
agreement and give a judgment, that judgment can also not be appealed. However,
an accused can apply to set the decision of the court aside for any of the
following reasons; the agreement was gotten based on fraud, misrepresentation, undue
influence, mistake, duress, illegality incapacity. Some of the terms are
explained below for your understanding.
1.
Misrepresentation
– this means one of the parties to the agreement made comments/statements that
were untrue and the other party relied on this untruth to agree to enter into
the agreement.
2.
Undue
Influence – this means one of the parties who has a higher authority or
influence used that power to unfairly coerce the other party into the
agreement. Usually, it is the prosecution or the police who could do this.
3.
Duress
– this means the other party was forced into the agreement and that he/she did
not enter into the agreement out of his freewill.
4.
Incapacity
– it means one of the parties did not have legal capacity to enter into a valid
contract. For example, a person less than 18 years or a person who was not of
sound mind at the time of making the agreement.
My Criticism
This part allows only the Prosecutor or
the accused to apply for the decision to be set aside. It does not contemplate
a situation where the victim wishes to apply to set this decision aside and the
prosecutor is not interested in doing so. I believe this has the potential of
denying a victim the justice he/she deserves.
Exceptions
The
current law as passed by parliament does not apply to every offence. The
following offences are offences that are not legible for plea bargain in Ghana.
1.
Treason or high Treason,
2.
High crime
3.
Rape
4.
Defilement
5.
Genocide
6.
Robbery
7.
Kidnapping
8.
Murder
9.
Attempted murder
10.
Abduction
11.
Piracy
12.
Hijacking
13.
any offence related to public
elections
My Comment
I believe we should consider adding
offenses relating to terrorism since they are getting closer to our boarders.
You can leave a
comment below and share the article freely. Feedbacks, contrary views and
criticisms are warmly welcome for the development of the public legal
education. You are also encouraged to follow this bog by clicking the menu in
the top left corner, then click FOLLOW, in order to be notified when a new article
is published.
WRITTEN BY
RICHARD NII AMARH ESQ.
Great piece 👍
ReplyDeleteI suggest acts of corruption and and wilfully causing financial lost to the State be exempted as well.
As much as I concur plea bargain is good for minor offences that do not warrant imprisonment, I see this as giving politicians and their likes carte blanche to wriggle their way free off...